<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ART BASEL MIAMI “IT’S A JOKE SON!”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artistkarenking.com/art-basel-miami-%e2%80%9cit%e2%80%99s-a-joke-son%e2%80%9d/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artistkarenking.com/art-basel-miami-%e2%80%9cit%e2%80%99s-a-joke-son%e2%80%9d</link>
	<description>An artist perspective on art and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://artistkarenking.com/art-basel-miami-%e2%80%9cit%e2%80%99s-a-joke-son%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artistkarenking.com/?p=286#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I agree with some points. I think that sometimes what sells in art is experimentation for the sake of experimentation, which can be interesting, but not when it defeats the point of art to begin with--to provoke thought. Sometimes if I am presented with an experimental piece of art or work of literature, I&#039;m conflicted between admiration and frustration at the opacity, as if the artist is trying to stop thought in its tracks.

It&#039;s sometimes hard to untangle the interesting experimentation from the incredibly UN-interesting experimentation, or real ideas from the pretentious and self-serving simulation of ideas.

In the end I think it comes down to the basic question of whether the artist is saying &quot;hey, look at me and how edgy I am&quot; or &quot;hey here is a thought-provoking experience or something beautiful for you to enjoy.&quot; Line is hard to draw sometimes but it&#039;s there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some points. I think that sometimes what sells in art is experimentation for the sake of experimentation, which can be interesting, but not when it defeats the point of art to begin with&#8211;to provoke thought. Sometimes if I am presented with an experimental piece of art or work of literature, I&#8217;m conflicted between admiration and frustration at the opacity, as if the artist is trying to stop thought in its tracks.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sometimes hard to untangle the interesting experimentation from the incredibly UN-interesting experimentation, or real ideas from the pretentious and self-serving simulation of ideas.</p>
<p>In the end I think it comes down to the basic question of whether the artist is saying &#8220;hey, look at me and how edgy I am&#8221; or &#8220;hey here is a thought-provoking experience or something beautiful for you to enjoy.&#8221; Line is hard to draw sometimes but it&#8217;s there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Connell</title>
		<link>http://artistkarenking.com/art-basel-miami-%e2%80%9cit%e2%80%99s-a-joke-son%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artistkarenking.com/?p=286#comment-453</guid>
		<description>The &quot;stars on thars&quot; value system certainly resonates re the current art scene. What a pasionate, thoughtful defense--with a truly important message. Oh my, absolutely love the roosters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;stars on thars&#8221; value system certainly resonates re the current art scene. What a pasionate, thoughtful defense&#8211;with a truly important message. Oh my, absolutely love the roosters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

